McCormick v. Kroger/Devlin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Petitioners have filed separate petitions in this court seeking review of the ballot title and of the explanatory statement for Referendum 301 (2010), which the Secretary of State has denominated as Ballot Measure 66. 1 We consolidate the petitions for purposes of this opinion.
Ballot Measure 66 results from a referendum of House Bill (HB) 2649 (2009), which increased certain personal income taxes effective for the 2009 tax year to raise revenue that the legislature budgeted for education, human services, public safety, and other public services. Or Laws 2009, ch 714. Because of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dixon / Frohnmayer v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Livingston v. KROGER/DEVLINOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Parrish v. Ellen RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2017