Legal Opinion
Maresca v. Town of Ridgefield
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 22, 1994No. 12531PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that he must exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit for damages in the trial court, and (2) held that he had abandoned his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights claim by failing to brief the issue in a memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
In February, 1987, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant town of Ridgefield as its data center manager.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zoning Commission v. Fairfield Resources Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Cummings v. Big Mac Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- O'Halloran v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Loulis v. ParrottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Human Rights RefereeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.