Legal Opinion

Loulis v. Parrott

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 23, 1996No. 14890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The plaintiffs in this declaratory judgment action appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly found that they had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies with respect to their challenge to a certificate of zoning compliance that was issued in March, 1995. While we agree with the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ action, we affirm the judgment on different but related grounds.

The record discloses the following relevant facts and procedural history.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Reynolds v. SofferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loulis v. ParrottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Munroe v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Masayda v. PedroncelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Loulis v. ParrottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API