Cummings v. Big Mac Mobile Homes, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
The issues raised by appellants Timothy and Alisa Cummings in this case are whether the trial court erred in concluding that an exception to the exhaustion-of-remedies doctrine did not apply and whether the regulations at issue exceeded the legislative authority granted to the Arkansas Manufactured Home Commission. We hold that an exception to the rule requiring an exhaustion of administrative remedies does apply in this case, and we reverse the trial court.
On January 9, 1995, the Cummingses purchased a new 1995 Classic Express mobile home from appellee Big Mac Mobile…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Byron L. Taylor v. United States Treasury Department, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- O & G Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- McGhee v. Arkansas State Board of Collection AgenciesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Austin v. Centerpoint Energy ArklaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board v. FrawleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Hotels.com, L.P. v. Pine Bluff Advertising & Promotion ComissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.