Legal Opinion

Porter v. Spader

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 21, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0678PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINTHROP, Judge.

¶ 1 Holly Porter (“Plaintiff”) appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing her complaint because it was untimely filed under the applicable statute of limitations. We hold that Rule 60(e)(1), Ariz. R. Civ. P., does not allow relief from a judgment entered based on a statute of limitations.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Plaintiff suffered personal injuries in an automobile collision on September 25, 2006. She secured the services of counsel, who prepared a civil complaint seeking compensation for those injuries. The complaint was mailed to the Navajo County Superior Court on September…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  2. Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Thomas Cox v. Hon. ponce/makayla EsplinArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Creasman v. Farmers Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
  5. De La Fuente v. Roosevelt Elementary School District No. 66District Court, D. Arizona · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API