Legal Opinion

Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc. v. Bailey

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2004No. S-10958, S-10968PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises out of Fred Meyer’s classification of manager Ron Bailey as an exempt employee and therefore ineligible for overtime pay under the Alaska Wage and Hour Act (AWHA). Bailey opted out of a class action for overtime pay because of a threat by his store manager. Within two years of being told by a different manager that participation in a court action would not jeopardize his job, Bailey filed a lawsuit claiming overtime compensation. Fred Meyer appeals the superior court’s finding that Bailey was not exempt, as well as the superi- or court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hosogai v. KadotaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kaiser v. Umialik InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Brannon v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Krause v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API