Legal Opinion

Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. Stepanoff

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1982No. 5789PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIMOND, Senior Justice.

This appeal challenges the propriety of the trial court’s refusal to enter a default judgment in a quiet title action. The trial court’s refusal was apparently based on its finding that the defaulting defendant, Joyce Stepanoff, has never formally conveyed her property interest in the disputed parcel of land but instead retains a present ownership interest. We recognize that care must be taken to ensure that an absent defendant is not unjustly deprived of his or her rights and that the decision to enter a default judgment accordingly rests within the sound…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McCracken v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Brown v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fuller v. FullerOregon Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Buster v. GaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Betz v. Chena Hot Springs GroupAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API