Legal Opinion
Betz v. Chena Hot Springs Group
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1987No. S-1948PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This appeal is from the denial of a motion to amend a complaint to add an antitrust claim. We reverse.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDUAL BACKGROUND
The facts are not in dispute. 1 The Chena Hot Springs Group (CHS) owns and operates Chena Hot Springs Resort. CHS is a limited partnership which had, at one time, three general partners: Robert Betz, William Kinn and Roger Cotting. In August 1980, Betz was voted out as a general partner. The earlier litigation between these parties concerned the propriety of Betzes’ forced retirement and the valuation of his partnership interest.
Robert…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Ruckle v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.