In re Nathaniel H. Speights
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) has recommended that respondent Nathaniel H. Speights be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for two years, and be required to prove fitness before reinstatement. In arriving at that recommendation, the Board adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of a Hearing Committee which determined that respondent, while acting as personal representative of the Estate of Arnold Lindsey, had violated Rules 1.1 (a), 1.1 (b), 1.3 (a), 1.3 (c), and 8.4 (d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cohen v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021