Hillyer v. Hynes
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Daniel C. Deasy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of the defendant and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleges that on the twenty-seventh day of September, 1909, Anna Flanigan Romoser was the owner of the real property here in controversy; that shortly before that date, being severely ill and not expecting to live, she entered into an arrangement with her husband, Henry Romoser, whereby she was to execute and deliver to him a deed of gift of said real property, and he in turn was to execute a like deed conveying the property to Catherine Meyers, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Dimond v. SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hanscom v. IrwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Airola v. GorhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Teixeira v. VerissimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.