Legal Opinion

Teixeira v. Verissimo

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1966No. Civ. 521PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (R.M.), J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs impressing a constructive or resulting trust upon an undivided one-sixth interest in a parcel of real property situated in Tulare County, and declaring the defendant Henrique Sousa Yerissimo, hereinafter referred to as Henry, an involuntary trustee thereof, and awarding judg ment in favor of the plaintiffs and against defendants Henry Verissimo and Emily Verissimo in the sum of $23,150 as the plaintiffs’ share of the reasonable rental value of the property.

On appeal the defendants contend that the plaintiffs’ cause of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eisenhower Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Rouse v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Agricultural Insurance v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API