Hanscom v. Irwin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, C. J.
Joe Hanscom, father of the plaintiff, died in 1928. By his will he devised to his son, William Hanscom, the land involved in this suit subject to a life estate in his widow. On May 20, 1930, while the estate of Joe Hanscom was still in course of probate the plaintiff excuted a general warranty deed purporting to convey to his then wife, the defendant, Inez Irwin, the South west quarter of Section Fourteen, in Township Pour North Range Thirty-two Past of the Willamette Meridian in Umatilla County, Oregon. The deed was re corded on the same day that it was executed. The description in the deed…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Cappon v. O'DayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Albino v. AlbinoOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Belleville v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Marston v. MYERS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
- SHIPE v. HillmanOregon Supreme Court · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.