Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1990No. SC S36931; SC S36932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

(Cases Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

This original proceeding consolidates two challenges to a ballot title certified by the Attorney General to the Secretary of State. The ballot title is for a measure which generally would require a physician to notify the parents of a pregnant minor prior to performing an abortion on the minor. The Attorney General certified the following ballot title, pursuant to ORS 250.067(2):

“DOCTOR MUST GIVE PARENT NOTICE BEFORE MINOR’S ABORTION
“QUESTION: Shall state law require doctor to give notice to parent or custodian at least two days before minor’s abortion?
“[SUMMARY]: Doctor must give notice at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sampson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Oregon Citizen's Alliance v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mabon v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ransom v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kane v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Buel/Markley v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Kane v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API