Legal Opinion

Kane v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1990No. SC S37288PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

This original proceeding challenges a ballot title for a proposed initiative measure that, if enacted, would amend the Oregon Constitution by adding the following section 41 to Article I:

“All people shall be secure in the Natural right, to exercise privacy in their personal affairs.”

The Attorney General certified the following ballot title to the Secretary of State, pursuant to ORS 250.067(2):

“AMENDS OREGON CONSTITUTION TO INCLUDE A RIGHT TO PRIVACY
“QUESTION: Shall the Constitution he amended to include a section allowing people ‘to exercise privacy in their personal affairs’?
“SUMMARY: This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bauman v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Parrish v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Buel/Markley v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Arenz v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API