Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Reed v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1988No. SC S34470 (Control), SC S34469, SC S34479PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

In this proceeding (consolidated for the purposes of argument and opinion), petitioners Reed, Wright and DiLorenzo challenge a ballot title certified by the Attorney General.

Petitioner Wright filed a prospective initiative petition which proposed the following measure:

“A BILL FOR AN ACT
“ANY PERSON, CORPORATION OR OTHER ENTITY SHALL BE PERMITED [sic] TO REPRESENT THEMSELVES BEFORE ANY COURT IN THE STATE OF OREGON. NO PERSON SHALL BE COMPELLED BY LAW TO EMPLOY ANY MEMBER OF ANY BAR ASSOCIATION.
“REPEALING
“9.320 Necessity for employment of attorney; effect of employment. Any action, suit, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marguerite E. Wright Trust v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc. v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Crabtree v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Fithian-Barrett v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ellis v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Johnson v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Glerum v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API