Legal Opinion

Kane v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1994No. SC S41274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioner is an elector who timely submitted written comments addressed to the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. Therefore, he is entitled to petition this court seeking a different title. ORS 250.085(2). The arguments that he now makes are related to the comments that he made during the administrative process. We modify the ballot title in certain respects and, as modified, certify it to the Secretary of State.

The proposed constitutional amendment is worded as follows:

“The ‘Committee…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bauman v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Scott-Schwalbach v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API