Legal Opinion
Jewelers v. Handy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 21, 1969No. File No. CV 6-695-41307; File No. CV 6-695-41306PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
Each of these two causes of action was brought on a separate complaint, followed by a substituted complaint, for money alleged to be owing by the defendant, and each plaintiff placed a foreign attachment or garnishment on the defendant’s checking account in the Tradesmens National Bank of *104New Haven. The foreign attachment was made pursuant to General Statutes § 52-329.1
Attorney John B. Williams filed a special appearance for the defendant. Above his signature were typed the words “appearing specially and solely for the purpose of pleading to the jurisdiction of the Court.” A plea in abatement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ownbey v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Coffin Brothers & Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Missouri Ex Rel. Hurwitz v. NorthSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adams v. EgleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1972
- Etheredge v. BradleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Messenger v. Sandy Motors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing and Finance CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.