Legal Opinion
Etheredge v. Bradley
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1972No. 1514, 1525PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINO WITZ, Justice.
The central issue in this appeal is whether the procedural authorization of summary prejudgment attachment of property provided for in Civil Rule 89 violates the due process guarantees of article I, section 7 of the Alaska constitution and the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution.
On July 20, 1970, B. J. Bath, Inc., filed suit against appellant Etheredge to recover a debt allegedly owed it. On July 22, Bath secured a writ of attachment from appellee Bradley, Clerk of the District Court for the State of Alaska, Third Judicial District. Bradley…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- McGinnis v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Graham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Bowers Office Products, Inc. v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.