Legal Opinion

Coffin Brothers & Co. v. Bennett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 30, 1928No. 465PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

In July, 1926, the Richland State Bank, organized under the laws of the State of Georgia, closed its doors and turned its affairs over tp the defendant in error, the Superintendent of Banks for the State. In the following September the Superintendent issued a notice to each of the plaintiffs in error .that an assessment of 100 per centum on the par value of his stock was levied, as necessary to pay the depositors in full. These proceedings were under and in accordance with the Banking Act of Georgia, of 1919, as amended in 1925, codified in 12 Park’s Annotated Code, § 2268(t). That section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Missouri Ex Rel. Hurwitz v. NorthSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Coffin Bros. & Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API