Legal Opinion
Missouri Ex Rel. Hurwitz v. North
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 12, 1926No. 209PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Plaintiff in error was a physician licensed to practice by the State Board of Health of Missouri. On complaint made to the Board, and after notice and hearing, his license to practice was revoked on the ground that he had unlawfully produced an, abortjón. The proceedings before the Board were reviewed on certiorari by the state Circuit Court and the determination of the Board sustained. On appeal to the Supreme Court of Missouri, the júdgment was affirmed. 304 Mo. 607. The case comes here on writ of error. Jud. Code, § 237.
By § 7336 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, the State Bdard of Health…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.