Legal Opinion

Demaggio v. Attorney General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1942No. Docket No. 40, Calendar No. 41,732PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiff, a member of the State Bar of Michigan, filed a petition for a declaration of rights pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 36, Pub. Acts 1929 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 13903-13909 [Stat. Ann. §§ 27.501-27.507]), the purpose being to secure a declaration of rights under the civil service amendment to the State Constitution, Mich. Const. (1908), art. 6, § 22, and to ascertain whether plaintiff’s State employment was protected by its provisions.

The facts are not in dispute. Prior to January 1, 1941, plaintiff was employed as an assistant attorney general under Attorney General Thomas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lamoreaux v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. Doe, Alias MeyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Ryan v. KerrOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Broadwater v. KendigMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Abt v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Glover v. FongHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Civil Service Commission v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Reed v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Snow v. KeddingtonUtah Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API