Legal Opinion

Abt v. Wilcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Calendar 37,231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The question here presented is whether a duly appointed deputy sheriff in the county of Wayne, who is a veteran of the World War, is entitled, under what is known as the veterans’ preference act (Act No. 67, Pub. Acts 1931 [amending 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 901]), to hold the office after the term of the sheriff who appointed him has expired. The trial court held that he was not, and from the order denying a writ of mandamus to reinstate him in such office the plaintiff has taken this appeal.

Section 2 of said Act No. 67 provides that no veteran—

“holding an office or employment in any public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Flint City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lamoreaux v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ellis v. Common Council of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Koeper v. Detroit Street Railway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bostatter v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carter v. Ann Arbor City AttorneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Winberg v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Demaggio v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Local 1518, Council 55, American Federation of State Employees v. St. Clair County SheriffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Day v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API