State Ex Rel. Ryan v. Kerr
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
This action originated in the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county. It is claimed by relator that the charter of the city of Cleveland affords him protection against a summary dismissal;' that a summary dismissal is in violation of the provisions of the charter and is of no effect.
It is further claimed that an assistant law director, under the provisions of the charter, must be regarded as in the classified service, and Section 126 of the' charter of the city of Cleveland is cited. This section is, in part, as follows:
‘ ‘ There shall be in the classified service two classes, to be known as the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Crane v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1896
- Dodin v. DodinNew York Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by15 opinions
- Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Minor v. EschenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Bednar v. City of North CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Demaggio v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.