Legal Opinion

Civil Service Commission v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1942No. Calendar No. 42,009PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, C. J.

The plaintiffs, who are the civil service commission of the State of Michigan and the four individual members thereof, who are suing in their official capacity, ask that a writ of mandamus be granted against the auditor general of this State requiring him to pay in full certain disbursements which they have approved. The answer of the auditor general shows for cause a lack of authority on his part, by reason of certain legislation, to draw and issue his warrants on the State treasury for the full sums approved by the commission.

The commission was created by a constitutional amendment, known…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Thomas v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Board of Regents of University of Michigan v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Colbert v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2011 PA 38Michigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Township of Dearborn v. Dearborn Township ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API