Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Yellen
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 8, 2016No. Civil Action No. 14-1673 (RMC)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Edward Richardson has filed suit pro se against his former employer, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, and seven individual Defendants for a variety of constitutional torts, common-law torts, and statutory violations that he alleges occurred during his employment with the Board as a law enforcement officer. Defendants move to dismiss all claims except those alleging disability discrimination. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted.
I. FACTS
The well-pleaded facts alleged in the operative complaint must be…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Burford v. YellenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Williams v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Richardson v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Richardson v. SaulsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.