Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Sweet

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1956No. S. F. 19179PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff Lucas appeals from a judgment for the defendants Sweet, Shinn, Freeman, Northern Counties Title Insurance Company, and Emco Investment Company, after their demurrers to his fifth amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend.

The plaintiff brought the action in August, 1952, to quiet title to real property and for other relief. Demurrers were sustained with leave to amend to the original complaint and to successive amended complaints. The demurrer to the last amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was entered for the defendants.

The last…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Carlson v. LindauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Martin v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. McNeil v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Aalwyn v. CobeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Warren v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Stafford v. BallingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Arechiga v. Housing Authority of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Lucas v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API