Legal Opinion

Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. Flam

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1993No. C5-93-799PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island challenges the district court’s order denying its petition to intervene in an action between respondent Evan Flam, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, Jerry Strauss, and defendant Rowland Pointe Partnership. Appellant also challenges the district court’s order denying its right to subrogation as a matter of law. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

In 1990, seven-year-old Evan Flam was severely injured when thousands of pounds of dirt caved in upon him on undeveloped land located next to his apartment complex. The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Diane M. Cutting and Warren L. Cutting v. Jerome Foods, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Shell v. Amalgamated Cotton GarmentDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  3. Marshall v. Employers Health InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
  4. Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Schultz Ex Rel. Schill v. Nepco Employees Mutual Benefit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API