Legal Opinion

FMC Corp. v. Holliday

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 27, 1990No. 89-1048PublishedCited by 927 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This case calls upon the Court to decide whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 829, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq., pre-empts a Pennsylvania law precluding employee welfare benefit plans from exercising subrogation rights on a claimant’s tort recovery.

I

Petitioner, FMC Corporation (FMC), operates the FMC Salaried Health Care Plan (Plan), an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA, §3(1), 29 U. S. C. §1002(1), that provides health benefits to FMC employees and their dependents. The Plan is self-funded; it does not purchase an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by927 opinions

  1. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

922 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API