Legal Opinion
Shell v. Amalgamated Cotton Garment
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1994No. 3-91-526PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Before the Court are (1) Plaintiffs Bash Shell and Marlene Shell’s (collectively, the “Shells”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and (2) defendants Amalgamated Cotton Garment and Allied Industries Fund (the “Fund”) and Amalgamated Life Insurance’s (“ALI”) Motion for Summary Judgment. The two motions are cross-motions for summary judgment; resolving them will comprise a final determination of the issues in dispute. 1
Background
This matter was before the Court in September of 1992 on the Shells’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Drexel Finley and Grace Finley v. Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers Ass'n of California Health & Welfare Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1958, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7111, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,137 Susan M. Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers Association of California Health and Welfare Benefit Plan, and Does 1 Through 25, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Marshall v. Employers Health InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
- National Employee Benefit Trust of the Associated General Contractors v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1996
- Waller v. Hormel Foods Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.