Legal Opinion
Schultz Ex Rel. Schill v. Nepco Employees Mutual Benefit Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided December 15, 1994No. 93-2099PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEich, C.J.
The plaintiff in this personal injury case, Bradley Schultz, appeals from a summary judgment distributing the proceeds of an insurance settlement of his claim.
Schultz, a minor, was injured in an accident caused by an insured of the State Farm Insurance Companies. State Farm conceded liability and tendered its policy limits of $100,000 to Schultz, who sought court approval of the settlement. Nepco Employees Mutual Benefit Association, Inc. (NEMBA), a self-funded employee benefit plan operated by the company for which Schultz's father worked, had paid $46,245.81 toward Schultz's medical…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Leilani Exbom v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Marshall v. Employers Health InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
- American Medical Security v. JosephsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Ninaus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Steffens v. BlueCross BlueShieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.