Lockhart v. MVM, INC.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHAVEZ, J.
Leslie Lockhart (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by MVM, Inc. (respondent), as to all four of appellant’s causes of action against respondent. The trial court’s ruling was based on its determination that appellant’s state law claims were barred because they arose on a federal enclave. We affirm.
CONTENTIONS
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because the evidence supported her position that the pertinent events occurred outside the federal enclave. Appellant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Carnes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Evans v. California Trailer Court, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- O'Neal v. Stanislaus County Employees' Retirement Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Kennicott v. Sandia Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Abikar v. Bristol Bay Native Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Daniel Quinn v. Southern California Edison CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.