Legal Opinion
O'Neal v. Stanislaus County Employees' Retirement Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 2017No. F070605PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DETJEN, J.—
OVERVIEW
Appellants, Michael R. O’Neal, Rhonda Biesemeier, and Dennis J. Nasrawi, appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment against them, as well as several related evidentiary rulings. Appellants are members of the retirement system operated by respondent Stanislaus County Employees’ Retirement Association (StanCERA) through their retirement board (the board). The intervener in this case, County of Stanislaus (County), is one of several employers required to fund the StanCERA retirement system.
In the aftermath of the recent recession, StanCERA implemented…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Elk Hills Power v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- DiCola v. White Brothers Performance Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Morgan v. Davidson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Alameda County Deputy etc. v. Alameda County Employees' etc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Alameda Health System v. Alameda County Employees' Retirement etc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- Ducksworth v. Tri-Modal Distribution ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Hodges v. County of PlacerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.