Legal Opinion
Abikar v. Bristol Bay Native Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 9, 2018No. Case No.: 3:17–cv–01036–GPC–AGSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). (ECF No. 7.) The motion is fully briefed. Based on the moving papers, and for the reasons below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to dismiss.
I. Allegations
In this putative class action, Plaintiffs allege the following relevant facts. Plaintiffs are East African refugees who currently are, or formerly were, employees of Defendants Bristol Bay Corporation ("BBNC"), Glacier Technical Solutions, LLC ("GTS"), and Workforce…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Collins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Daniel Quinn v. Southern California Edison CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Luciano v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Thomas v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Thompson v. Wallace Commercial LandscapeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.