Legal Opinion
Daniel Quinn v. Southern California Edison Company
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 22, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02624Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 DANIEL QUINN, Case № 2:25-cv-02624-ODW (KSx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO REMAND [13]; AND 14 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 15 COMPANY et al., MOTION TO DISMISS [10] Defendants. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Daniel Quinn filed this action in state court against his former 20 employers, Defendants Southern California Edison Company and Edison International 21 (collectively, “SCE”). (Declaration Robert S. Blumberg ISO Notice Removal Ex. A 22…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.