Legal Opinion

ST. PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC. v. Kuehl

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 2011No. SC 18387PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

This appeal requires us to consider the narrow question of whether a respondent in a workers’ compensation action, prior to the completion of proceedings before the workers’ compensation com missioner (commissioner), may bring a declaratory judgment action in the Superior Court, challengmg the constitutionality of the statute on which a claimant relies to confer jurisdiction on the commissioner. The intervening defendants, Rosalind J. Koskoff and Koskoff, Koskoff and Bieder, P.C., appeal 1 from the trial court’s summary judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, The St.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. State v. SwebiliusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Blakely v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. Coyle v. CommissionerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API