ST. PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC. v. Kuehl
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
This appeal requires us to consider the narrow question of whether a respondent in a workers’ compensation action, prior to the completion of proceedings before the workers’ compensation com missioner (commissioner), may bring a declaratory judgment action in the Superior Court, challengmg the constitutionality of the statute on which a claimant relies to confer jurisdiction on the commissioner. The intervening defendants, Rosalind J. Koskoff and Koskoff, Koskoff and Bieder, P.C., appeal 1 from the trial court’s summary judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, The St.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. SwebiliusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Blakely v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Coyle v. CommissionerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.