Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Dow

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1949No. Civ. 14005PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

There are two appeals by appellant, a daughter of decedent, from three orders of the probate court: (1) from the minute order dated March 29, 1948, denying the petition for accounting, for revocation of letters of administration, and for the appointment of a disinterested administrator; (2) from the decree settling the first account of the administratrix and supplement thereto, dated April 13, 1948 ; and (3) from the order dated May 13, 1948, granting respondent, widow of decedent, a family allowance.

No Appeal Lies From Minute Order

Pursuant to section 522 of the Probate Code, appellant filed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. In Re Estate of PendellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Estate of HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Delany v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Lassen v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API