Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1911No. Docket No. 124PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J". Case by Richard Stevenson against the Detroit United Railway for injuries to plaintiff’s wife and automobile. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Plaintiff brings his action against defendant to recover damages resulting from the alleged negligent operation of one of its cars. A verdict having been directed in favor of defendant, plaintiff has removed the case to this court for review upon writ of error.

Helen avenue runs north and south, and Kercheval avenue east and west, in the city of Detroit. Upon Kercheval avenue defendant operates a double-track street railway, the northerly track carrying west-bound, *46cars and the southerly track those going in an easterly direction. The accident occurred near the intersection of these two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gardner v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Merritt v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Doherty v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Champaign v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ude v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. King v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Puffer v. Muskegon Traction & Lighting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API