Legal Opinion

Ude v. Fuller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1915No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Kent; Connine, J., presiding. Case by Samuel W. Ude against Clayton W. Fuller for damages caused by personal injuries to plaintiff’s minor son. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This is a personal injury case, brought by the plaintiff against the defendant for loss of services of plaintiff’s minor son and expenses incurred in caring for him on account of such personal injury. The son, while riding a bicycle, collided with an automobile driven by the defendant, at the junction of two public streets in the city of Grand Rapids. The accident occurred at noon on the 2d day of June, 1913, a bright, clear day. Henry Ude, the son, a young man 18 years of age, was going east on Oak street, west of Commerce avenue, and, according to his testimony, was riding on the south or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zoltovski v. GzellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Gibbs v. DaytonMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Tolmie v. Woodward Taxicab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Stevenson v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Block v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Geeck v. LuckenbillMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Koehler v. ThomMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Weller v. ManchaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Bratvold v. LalumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API