Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1893PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff had verdict and judgment on the trial in the court below for negligent injuries. Defendant brings error, and insists that, under the plaintiff’s own testimony and the special findings of the jury, the judgment should have been entered for defendant.

It appears that the defendant company operates its line of road through the city of Ionia. The tracks, seven in number, cross what is known as “Depot Street.” This street leads to the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee depot, and is a common thoroughfare, used and traveled by a large number of people daily, and has sidewalks upon either…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matta v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Brady v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Nevius v. Bank of LansingburghMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Baker v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Schmidt v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API