Legal Opinion

State v. Minton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1952No. 222PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

The defendants make these assertions by their assignments of error:

1. That the court erred in refusing to dismiss the prosecution upon a compulsory nonsuit. G.S. 15-173.

2. That the court erred in the admission of testimony.

3. That the court erred in its instructions to the jury.

The parties to homicides are divided into four classes: (1) Principals in the first degree. (2) Principals in the second degree. (3) Accessories before the fact. (4) Accessories after the fact. S. v. Powell, 168 N.C. 134, 83 S.E. 310.

Tbe State bottoms this prosecution on the theory that Minton is guilty as a principal…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. JenerettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API