Legal Opinion

George L. Williams v. Mutual of Omaha

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1962No. 8352PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

Upon a claim of a fraudulent breach of a contract of health and accident insurance, judgment was entered in the District Court requiring the insurance company to pay to the plaintiff $12,000 actual damages and $3,000 punitive damages. Its motions for the direction of a verdict in its favor, and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, were denied. We conclude that the denial of these motions was improper.

In 1928, the insurance company issued to the plaintiff, Williams, then a resident of Florida, a health and accident insurance policy. 1 The plaintiff chose to pay…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Prescott v. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass'n.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. Harwell v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  4. Barkley v. International Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Cantey, Adm'r v. Phila. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rouse Co. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998
  2. Miller v. Mutual Benefit Health & Acc. Ass'n of OmahaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. George Washington University v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Floyd v. Ohio General InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1988
  5. Burk v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API