Barkley v. International Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The sole question to be decided in this appeal is whether a brother of an insured, who is married, with a family of his own and living separate and apart from the insured, is a member of the insured’s immediate family within the meaning of an automobile liability policy which provides that the policy only covered the named insured and members of his immediate family when operating the insured’s automobile with his permission.
The facts giving rise to this litigation are not in dispute and, as stipulated for the record, are as follows:
Vincent Adams (or Vinson Adams, his given name being spelled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Home Ins. Co. v. PettitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Cantey, Adm'r v. Phila. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Moyer v. DrummondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
- Jones v. Prudential Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Bolen v. Capital Life Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
3Cited by25 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Unisun Insurance v. Hertz Rental Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Novak v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Johnson v. Universal Automobile Insurance Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.