Legal Opinion

Prescott v. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass'n.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 19, 1938PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

—The appeal is from final decree as follows:

“It Is Hereby Considered, Ordered and Decreed that said policy of insurance is unambiguous; that additional provisions ‘C’ and ‘D’ contained in said policy give the defendant Insurance Company the right to accept or reject any payment of renewal premiums offered, and that in the absence of an acceptance of any renewal premium offered, said policy terminates and ceases to continue in effect past the end of the previous term for which premium was accepted by the Defendant Company; that the refusal of the Defendant Company to accept the renewal premium…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Webster Lumber Co. v. LincolnSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Strong & Trowbridge Co. v. H. Baars & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Ross v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  5. Spann v. BaltzellSupreme Court of Florida · 1847

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Holmstrom v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. Bent Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. Harwell v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  4. Bullock v. HarwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  5. Mehler v. HustonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API