George Washington University v. Scott
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Appellants George Washington University and George Washington University Health Plan (“GWU”) appeal rulings by the trial court denying their Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, and their Motion to Reconsider and Vacate, Alter, or Amend. GWU argues that a binding arbitration clause contained in a health plan contract bars the trial sought by appellees Juanita S. Scott and Houston E'. Ashlock, Jr. (“the Scotts” or “the insureds”), on claims of medical malpractice in the death of their son. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Napoleon v. HeardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bahn v. Chicago Motor Club InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Benner v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Hodge v. National Fidelity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Watson Wyatt & Co. v. SBC Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Coffman v. Provost ★ Umphrey Law Firm, L.L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
- Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re Brookshire Bros., Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Yehuda Steiner v. American Friends of Lubavitch (Chaabad)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.