Legal Opinion
Picco v. Town of Voluntown
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 16, 2010No. SC 18375PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the defendants may be held liable pursuant to General Statutes § 52-557n (a) (1) (C) 1 for damages caused by their failure to act to abate an alleged public nuisance. The plaintiffs, Monica Picco, Joseph S. Picco, Jr., and their children, Nicole Picco and Dominic Picco, appeal 2 from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the named defendant, the town of Voluntown (town), and the defendant town board of education (board). 3 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim, inter alia, that the trial court improperly determined…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Wright v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Austen v. CATTERTON PARTNERS V, LPDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Chirieleison v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Simms v. SeamanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.