Legal Opinion
Simms v. Seaman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 28, 2011No. AC 31809PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The plaintiff, Robert Simms, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants Penny Q. Seaman, Susan A. Moch, Kenneth J. Bartschi, Brendon P. Levesque and Karen L. Dowd.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly struck the claims for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress filed against the defendants on the ground of absolute immunity and, thereafter, improperly rendered judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts as alleged in the plaintiffs amended complaint…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simms v. SeamanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Smigelski v. DuboisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014