Legal Opinion
Austen v. CATTERTON PARTNERS V, LP
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 2, 2010No. 3:09CV1257 (MRK)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.
This lawsuit arises out of the October 2008 bankruptcies of three related cookie companies, which the Court refers to throughout this Memorandum of Decision as the Archway Entities. Following the bankruptcies, the Archway Entities closed their facilities and terminated their employees, including Plaintiffs Jeffrey Austen and David Icardi. Mr. Austen and Mr. Icardi claim that Defendants are liable under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (“WARN”) Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101 et seq., and California Labor Code §§ 1400 et seq.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Porina Ex Rel. Porins v. Marward Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stanley Shook// Terry Walden and Joy Walden v. Terry Walden and Joy Walden// Stanley Shook, Patrick Jaehne and S&J Endeavors, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
- In Re CarterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- TicketNetwork, Inc. v. DarbouzeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Carter v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Friedman v. Bloomberg LPDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.