Legal Opinion

La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. Halley

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 11502PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The COURT.

The La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District has filed an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondents to sign and attest certain bonds claimed to have been duly authorized by the irrigation district of which the respondents are respectively the president and secretary. That application is pending and undetermined. The alleged purpose of the bond issue is the acquisition of an additional water supply and the purchase of a distributing system from the Cuyamaca Water Company. Elsie W. Sullivan and Jerry Sullivan have requested leave to file a complaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wright v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Isaacs v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McNeil v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Veterans' Industries, Inc. v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. State ex rel. Randall v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API