Legal Opinion

Wright v. Jordan

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1923No. S. F. No. 10940PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

The petitioner herein, Allen H. Wright, alleging himself to be the city clerk of the city of San Diego, also petitioner herein, applies for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent herein, as Secretary of State of the state of California, to forthwith file in his office certain documents purporting to set forth the official record of the canvass of the returns of an election held in the city of San Diego upon the question of a proposed consolidation of the said city of San Diego with the city of East San Diego, together with the official record of the canvass of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Pacheco v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. McNeil v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. Bd. of Supervisors of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. McFadden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API