Legal Opinion

Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. Brock

California Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1939No. L. A. No. 17004PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This proceeding was instituted for the purpose of restraining the defendant, the Director of Agriculture, from enforcing as against the plaintiffs, the provisions of chapter 10, division IV, of the Agricultural Code of this state and the marketing plan for stabilization of the milk industry formulated by him pursuant thereto for the Los Angeles County area. The plaintiffs consist of producers, distributors, and consumers of milk within said area. The appellants herein to whom we shall refer hereafter as interveners, filed a petition in the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Isaacs v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Grand Rapids v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Veterans' Industries, Inc. v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API